Jill Biden ACCUSED of Elder Abuse Coverup

Man speaking at an outdoor event with Biden sign

House Oversight Committee member Rep. Andy Biggs has accused former First Lady Jill Biden of elder abuse, alleging she deliberately concealed Joe Biden’s cognitive decline from the American people during his presidency.

Story Highlights

Rep. Biggs formally accuses Jill Biden of elder abuse and deceiving the country about Biden’s mental state
House Oversight Committee refers matter to Department of Justice for potential criminal prosecution
Investigation reveals unprecedented use of autopens for presidential signatures on official documents
Multiple White House staff members invoke Fifth Amendment protections during congressional testimony
Biggs calls for constitutional amendment to strengthen 25th Amendment mechanisms

Elder Abuse Allegations Target Former First Lady

Representative Andy Biggs delivered explosive testimony to Newsmax on October 28, 2025, directly accusing Jill Biden of elder abuse. “I believe she engaged in elder abuse. And I think that she deceived the country,” Biggs stated unequivocally. The Arizona Republican’s allegations represent the most serious criminal accusations yet leveled against the former First Lady regarding her role in allegedly concealing President Biden’s deteriorating condition from Congress and the American public.

The House Oversight Committee has formally referred the matter to the Department of Justice, with Biggs expressing hope that federal prosecutors will pursue criminal charges. This referral transforms what began as congressional oversight into a potential criminal investigation targeting high-level Democratic figures. The gravity of these allegations cannot be understated—they represent unprecedented accusations against a former First Lady for actions taken while her husband served as president.

Constitutional Crisis and Autopen Scandal

House Speaker Mike Johnson, a former constitutional law litigator, characterized the situation as having “no legal precedent” and described it as “incredible and insane.” The investigation uncovered systematic use of mechanical autopens to forge the presidential signature on official documents, including pardons. This practice, which Johnson deemed unprecedented in presidential history, raises fundamental questions about the authenticity of executive actions taken during Biden’s final months in office.

Biggs advocates for amending the 25th Amendment, arguing current constitutional mechanisms failed because they depend on good-faith compliance from insiders who allegedly participated in the cover-up. The existing constitutional framework proved inadequate when those closest to the president chose deception over transparency. This constitutional failure demands immediate reform to prevent future administrations from similarly deceiving Congress and the American people about presidential fitness.

White House Staff Resistance and Fifth Amendment Protections

Multiple White House staff members, including Dr. Kevin O’Connor and Anthony Bernal, have invoked Fifth Amendment protections during congressional testimony. This widespread resistance indicates potential criminal liability among Biden administration officials who may have participated in concealing the president’s condition. The pattern of Fifth Amendment invocations suggests coordinated efforts to avoid self-incrimination regarding their roles in the alleged cover-up.

Biggs has advocated offering immunity to compel testimony from these protected witnesses, followed by contempt proceedings if they continue to refuse cooperation. This prosecutorial strategy demonstrates the committee’s determination to overcome witness resistance and extract truthful testimony about the alleged deception. The American people deserve answers about how their government functioned when the president’s cognitive abilities were allegedly compromised, and these staff members hold crucial information about that conspiracy of silence.